Pattern
Crystallization
Encode human judgment into configurable constraints. AI executes within those constraints. One expert's judgment scales through AI execution.
"Your judgment, crystallized."
— CREATE SOMETHING
Definition
Crystallization is the process of encoding human judgment—taste, philosophy, domain expertise—into configurable constraints that AI agents can execute. The expert doesn't disappear; they become infrastructure.
This is curated autonomy: the human decides the boundaries, the AI works within them. Unlike "autonomous organizations without humans in the loop," crystallization keeps human judgment central—it just doesn't require human presence for every decision.
A legal expert crystallizes contract review criteria. A finance expert crystallizes audit trail requirements. A designer crystallizes aesthetic principles. The AI executes these judgments at scale.
"The question is not 'can AI do this?' but 'what judgment should guide how AI does this?'"
Curated Autonomy vs. Full Autonomy
Curated Autonomy
Human judgment crystallized into constraints. AI executes within boundaries.
- • Expert encodes quality criteria
- • AI executes at scale
- • Judgment persists across sessions
- • One human serves many
- • Constraints evolve with learning
Full Autonomy
"No humans in the loop." AI makes all decisions.
- • No quality criteria encoding
- • AI decides what "good" means
- • No domain expertise transfer
- • Humans are replaced, not scaled
- • Black box decision-making
The difference: Crystallization answers "who decides what good looks like?" with "the human expert, once, forever." Full autonomy answers "the AI, every time, alone."
What Gets Crystallized
Model Routing
Which AI model handles which task. Cost optimization meets capability matching.
modelRouting:
patterns:
haiku: [rename, typo, format]
opus: [architect, design, refactor]
sonnet: [add, update, fix]
Quality Gates
What must pass before work is considered complete. Domain-specific criteria.
# Legal domain example
qualityGates:
custom:
- name: contract-validation
command: pnpm run validate:contracts
canBlock: true
Review Criteria
What reviewers look for. Security, architecture, quality—with custom prompts.
reviewers:
reviewers:
- id: compliance
type: custom
prompt: ./reviewers/compliance.md
canBlock: true
Label Taxonomy
How work is categorized. Reflects organizational structure and priorities.
labels:
scope: [agency, io, space, ltd]
type: [feature, bug, refactor, research]
Domain Examples
Legal
Contract review, compliance checking, redaction validation.
✓ contract-validation: Check clause requirements
✓ redaction-check: Verify PII removal
✓ compliance-review: Regulatory requirements
Finance
Audit trails, calculation verification, regulatory compliance.
✓ audit-trail: Ensure transaction logging
✓ calculation-verify: Validate financial math
✓ sox-compliance: SOX requirement checks
Manufacturing
Tolerance verification, BOM validation, quality control.
✓ tolerance-check: Verify specifications
✓ bom-validation: Bill of materials accuracy
✓ qc-inspection: Quality control criteria
Design
Canon compliance, accessibility, animation auditing.
✓ canon-audit: Design token compliance
✓ a11y-check: WCAG requirements
✓ motion-review: Animation purposefulness
Implementation
The Harness Config
Place harness.config.yaml in your
project root. The harness auto-discovers and applies it.
version: "1.0"
modelRouting:
default: sonnet
complexity:
trivial: haiku
simple: sonnet
standard: sonnet
complex: opus
patterns:
haiku: [rename, typo, format]
opus: [architect, design, refactor]
qualityGates:
enabled: true
builtIn:
tests: true
typecheck: true
lint: true
custom:
- name: your-domain-check
command: pnpm run validate
canBlock: true
reviewers:
enabled: true
reviewers:
- id: security
type: security
enabled: true
canBlock: true
- id: domain-expert
type: custom
prompt: ./reviewers/domain.mdUsage
# Auto-discovers config
harness work cs-xyz
# Explicit config
harness start spec.yaml --config custom.yaml
Philosophy
Crystallization is the Subtractive Triad applied to human judgment itself:
DRY (Implementation): Encode judgment once, execute many times. Don't repeat the same quality decision for every task.
Rams (Artifact): Only crystallize judgment that earns its existence. Not every preference needs to be a constraint.
Heidegger (System): Crystallized judgment should serve the whole. Constraints that don't serve users get removed.
The hermeneutic circle applies: the crystallized config informs AI execution, AI execution reveals what needs crystallizing, which refines the config. Understanding deepens through the cycle.
"The goal is not to remove humans from the loop, but to make human judgment scale without requiring human presence for every decision."
When to Apply
Apply When
- • Expert judgment should scale
- • Quality criteria are domain-specific
- • AI is executing, not deciding strategy
- • Consistency matters across executions
- • You want to serve many without being present
Balance With
- • Novel situations need fresh judgment
- • Over-constraint kills exploration
- • Some decisions should remain human
- • Crystallized != frozen (evolve the config)
Related Patterns
Principled Defaults
Every value traces to a principle. Crystallized judgment is principled by definition.
Constraint as Liberation
Crystallized constraints free AI to work without constant guidance.
Dwelling in Tools
Crystallized judgment enables tools to recede. The harness disappears; work remains.
Hermeneutic Spiral
Crystallized configs evolve. Each execution informs the next refinement.
Part of the CREATE SOMETHING Pattern Library